By Kamiya Jani
Quite
often, splits in joint family leads to split in relations as well.
Conflicts on who has financially contributed more to the family will
always arise with both parties believing that they had more to do with
the success, creating a lot of animosity amongst the members of the
family.
“Things
become a lot less complicated if the founder member i.e. the head of
the family is alive and still plays an active role in the carrying on
of the business since settlements and divisions between the siblings
tend to be more easily accepted by them,” says Prerana Salaskar,
Certified Financial Planner.
Ideally,
the creation of a succession plan should be suggested as soon as
possible in order to prevent any further disputes between the siblings
after the death of the founder. This would take care of all the
succession issues, which arise in case of future conflicts. In other
words it could work like a ‘business will’ of the founder.
In
case of the absence of the founder member, things could take an ugly
turn with none of the parties willing to settle on issues such as who
gets to use the company name? How does one divide the assets? On what
basis is the splitting of assets done? So on and so forth. The most
important consideration from this point of view would be ownership and
valuation of the business and assets.
Experts
suggest that approaching the judiciary system for resolving disputes is
not a good idea since it could take long years to settle, besides
having to wash the family’s dirty linen very publicly. It
is not uncommon to have atleast one party nursing feelings of ‘having
been cheated’ at the end of the judiciary-approached settlement.
Therefore, it is better to solve the disputes amongst yourself and
do fair and justified asset allocation by working on the guidelines as
mentioned below.
Making a log of your assets/ Log network valuation
Valuation
of the assets is the first thing that needs to be done while you are
planning to split. One must value all the assets at the given point of
time. Like, valuing shares, gold, property, investment instruments and
so on. This gives an overall idea of the capital to the head of the
family and also the other members of the family.
Choose the method
There
are two methods of planning distribution - one could be with elementary
planning taking the current value of the assets in effect and another
way would be with prudent planning taking the future value of assets
into consideration.
However,
everybody in the family would perceive the future value of an asset in
a different way. So, people might want to make things easy by going for
an elementary planning and allocate assets based on the current value,
however unprofitable that may be. Certified Financial Planner, Kartik
Jhaveri explains this with an example, “If the head of the family
decides to give gold worth Rs 5 lakh to one of his son and Rs 5 lakh
worth of shares to his other son. The value of the gold, ten years down
the line, could probably be Rs 10 lakh but the value of shares then
could be Rs 25 lakh. This proves that the son having gold was not
benefited as much as his brother was.
A
prudent way of distributing assets would be to take 10-20 years
horizon. This helps in preventing uneven distribution of assets. Like,
a better option to the mentioned scenario could be giving gold worth
Rs.2.5 lakh and shares of Rs.2.5 lakh to each son, which would lead to
a better and cautious planning.
Distribution ratio
Conflicts
on who has contributed more to the business will always arise with both
parties believing that they had more to do with the success of the
company. The head of the family is often in confusion as to how much is to be given and to whom.
According
to Jhaveri, one must put the law aside and think about the conscience.
“If it is an inherited property, which is being carried forward by the
generation, each member of the family must ideally get an equal share.
You have to be honest to distribute it honestly. Whereas, if there is
something that you have created/built all by yourself, you have a
complete right to decide how you want to distribute it.”
Consulting family members/ financial planner
Once
the value of the assets, method and the distribution pattern is chosen,
All members of the family must sit together to come to a decision. The
distribution plan must be put forward and if anyone is not satisfied
with the plan, they can voice their opinion. However, to prevent any
kind of bias or confusion, it is best to also consult a financial
expert or a mediator, who can give an unbiased and honest opinion.
Preparation of a will
With
family’s consent, the head of the family must finally prepare the will
stating the distribution of the assets. At the end of the day, it may
not be possible to please everyone but the head of the family must be
fair in his decisions to prevent bitterness between blood relations.
Salaskar
suggests, “In case, the families are unable to settle amicably amongst
themselves, a mediator equally respected by both the parties and who is
in a position to give an impartial judgement for resolving conflicts is
necessary." The family could turn to a senior member of the family
(possibly the spouse of the founder who also happens to be the parent
of the siblings) or could be a long trusted senior legal advisor /
financial advisor / CA of the family or an individual close to the
founder member who isn’t part of the family.
Link: http://news.moneycontrol.com/mccode/news/article/news_article.php?autono=233012